The current work as it stood last night when I took a quick look before heading off to bed. I see light at the end of the tunnel; should be done this weekend.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Monday, May 20, 2013
. . . not really . . . this last week was busy with out-of-the-studio tasks as well as a lot of time spent sifting through photos and scraps of paper with ideas scribbled out, planning work for the next two months. Some special events coming up this fall require thoughtful contemplation, so I've been working on compositional ideas for those new works this past week. Should be back at the board shortly and hope to post things as they progress. Sometimes it's nice to have a sort of assembly line of sketched out ideas ready to go, one after the other, when on a time-line deadline (work to be accomplished before August 1).
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
I got to work earlier than usual today so, now that this work is finished, I have the rest of the afternoon to myself. 'Grandmother's Chair' (image size 8 1/4" x 15") will head west shortly for next month's big Anniversary Show at the newly renovated Howard/Mandville Gallery in Kirkland, Washington State.
Friday, May 10, 2013
Thursday, May 09, 2013
It's Now . . . Official!
Though having made the announcement a couple months back, after receiving the 'call' from Kathy Foley, the director of the Woodson Art Museum, that I will be honored this fall with the Master Wildlife Artist medal at the opening of this year's edition of 'Birds in Art', it is official today with the release of press announcements. A nice little article in the Wausau Daily Herald speaks to that. Thanks to Keith Uhlig for an interesting interview yesterday. And, it is also the day that the museum has sent out word of the artists and art works that were selected by the jury for this year's exhibition. I'm pleased to see that so many artist friends have 'made the cut' this year, disappointed for those who did not and excited in general to once again, be a part of such a well respected and internationally recognized annual art event.
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
As noted in my posting of last Friday, I had been at work on this piece for fall's Western Visions show and sale at the National Museum of Wildlife Art in Jackson, Wyoming. Finished up and framed yesterday, the image size is 7" x 15 1/2". Hit the link and you will be able to see, as soon as all images are loaded onto the site, all of the works that will be available for 'bidding' during the show in September. Bid slips will be entered and a name will be drawn for first option to purchase a work. Details of the bidding process are available on the museum's site along with an easy sign up process for over-the-web bidding. It's a great opportunity to pick up smaller scale, less expensive works from some of the country's top artists.
Sunday, May 05, 2013
The Jury is Out
After being out of the studio the past week, some ramblings
today on . . . 'the jury process' . . . since having it fresh in my mind after
having sat, for the second time, on the jury for the annual members' exhibition
of the Society of Animal Artists. The last time I participated on a jury was
almost ten years ago but the general rules of procedure, altered slightly for a
more 'blind' presentation, were pretty standard of what I think most juries for
selection of art and sculpture must represent. Any artist who is interested in
having his or her work reviewed and selected from hundreds of submissions by
fine and creative people from around the globe, needs to approach a jury
process with great care; the representation of one's art before a jury of knowledgeable
individuals must show to its best.
First and foremost, the photography of an image of a work of
art for jury consideration, whether three or two dimensional, must be presented
in a simple straightforward and succinct way. This sounds intuitive, but I
can't tell you the number of images we saw that were fuzzy or slightly out of
focus or not lighted properly to enhance the image rather than to detract from
it. No juror is going to lean toward selecting a work for exhibition if that
juror cannot see it to its best advantage, especially if there are hundreds of
other works to choose from. The time involved in reviewing sometimes as many as
a thousand individual entries can be staggering and a juror's eye must be captured, almost instantly, when an
image is flashed on a screen to be able to make a meaningful judgment. No
matter how fine a work of art may be, if the photographic capture of that image
is not top notch, it is going to have less of an impact, to a juror, than it
possibly should and often, will be disregarded for another image of, perhaps, a
lesser work that is presented in a completely professional manner.
With the proliferation of fine quality and relatively easy
to manipulate photo programs for digital imagery and computers these days,
there really is no reason for a less than professional looking, in focus, color
true, high resolution image for jury submission. And if an artist does not have
personal access to such programming, there are friends to call upon or many
professional businesses who can do this for a minimal cost. When considering
the possible future ramifications of having a fine work of art accepted into a
major exhibition, the time and effort involved in generating the best image of
a work of art possible, is of utmost importance. Last minute, meet the deadline
photography for jury purposes just does not, usually, result in putting an
artist's best foot forward
As to the method I use for photographing my finished
drawings, I take them outside into my back patio on a bright sunny day and
shoot the images in full shade, not direct sunlight. I do this as sometimes the
sunlight will capture just a bit of 'sheen' from heavy dark areas of graphite
on a work which does not happen, in general, when shot in full shade. I am sure
that most of my painter friends shoot their works in full sun to render the
colors more precisely but do know a few who will also take a shot or two in
shade and make a comparison in their computer photo program to see which lighting
situation shows the work to its truest color indications.
As to photography of three dimensional works, I believe
suggestions coming from a sculptor friend would be advisable, but of the images
that I have seen, the ones that seem to read best and show a work to its truest
form are those that are shot against a sold, rather colorless background;
sometimes a draped cloth pulled tight with few if any wrinkles, directly lit to
show no shadows is used, other times a large sheet of paper or other stiffer
material can achieve a similar result. In any method used, the focus should be
on capturing the sharpest essence of the work in two different angles of the
sculpture, lit so as to highlight the important features of the piece.
I noted, as we viewed the three dimensional works last week,
that a number of submissions were represented with only one image and, in some
cases, not showing that particular work to its best advantage. I believe that
in most jury situations, a three dimensional work may be submitted for
consideration with two images and don't quite understand why a sculptor would
not take advantage of that possibility. In several other instances of works
submitted for our jury last week, a piece was shown in two images but the
second image submitted did little if anything to further a truer understanding
of a particular work and often, in the opinions of some of the jurors in post
jury discussions later in the day, questioned why a particular side or aspect
of a work had not been shown. Jurors knowledgeable in sculptural works
wondered, out loud, if the sculptor had intentionally not highlighted a feature
that they were not completely pleased with or feared would not read appropriately
to the jury. This may not have been, at all, the reason for such questioned
images from a particular sculptor, but the slightest concern along those lines on the part of a
juror will, quite often, leave that particular work in questionable light and,
perhaps, knock it out of contention when viewed alongside other more
appropriately presented images.
With time of the essence in a jury process, if an artist's
image doesn't almost immediately grasp the attention of a juror through
complete professional presentation, the opportunity for that work to be
considered more deeply will, often, have
been lost. It behooves the artist to take the time necessary, therefore, to not
only produce a work that may connect either emotionally or for whatever
significant reason with a juror, but one that is photographed and presented in a way to register to its fullest
ability and imprint in the mind of that individual for more than the 40 seconds
it is seen on the screen in a darkened room.
Friday, May 03, 2013
I've been out of the studio this past week to attend the spring meeting of the Board of Directors of the Society of Animal Artists, to which I have just taken a seat for a three year term. I had the opportunity, while away, to spend a great few hours last Sunday in lower Manhattan walking the High Line and getting a great and interesting view of the lower end of the island. Did I take photos? Dah! I have already filed away about a dozen ideas for upcoming works and surely there will be more to come. But for now, I am returning to work on a piece I began before leaving last weekend which will head to the National Museum of Wildlife Art for this year's edition of Western Visions, their annual fund raiser and art show extraordinaire. Now that all the new work has been completed for the Master's Exhibition at the Woodson Art Museum this fall, I shall be tackling new works for gallery exchange over the next couple of months and hope to offer some smaller scale pieces at a drastically reduced price again as I have done in the last year or so, so hang around here or check my Facebook page in the near future to see what might be offered for purchase.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)